Graph 1: Life Expectency: South Africa 1910 to 2007

This in turn implies that resources are being correctly spent on the balance of prevention, comfort of the ill, sustaining the infected and the search for a cure or vaccine. For the correct actions to be taken, the correct policies need to be in place and fully implemented. And this is where South Africa has failed. The Mbeki administration’s denial policy and the failure of this policy are clearly visible in the first graph¹. Compared to fifteen years ago, the average South African can expect to live about twelve years less than his/her counterpart from the early 1990s. This is compounded by the fact that during the preceding ten years the average wealth of South Africans reduced as a result of sanctions, boycotts, etc.

A graph¹ provides a representation of the declining life expectancy in South Africa in a clear and unambiguous way, free from emotion and politicisation. Life expectancy peaked in the early nineties at around 60 years. Since then there has been a downward spiral that shows no sign of an upturn. This is despite the fact that GDP per capita growth has been strong over the last couple of years. In normal times this strong growth would be expected to be accompanied by a rise in life expectancy.

Graph 2: Life Expectency: South Africa vs. Uganda vs. Botswana

The hope is that the curve has bottomed out and this may be supported by the fact that StatsSA 2008 reported estimated life expectancy is slightly higher than the 2007 figure used in the graphs.

Botswana and Uganda have both put in place effective policies and are seeing the positive effects of those policies. Uganda has been known as a leader in the prevention of HIV/AIDS and has put in place effective policies that have reversed the declining life expectancy, to the extent that they are adding an extra year to their expected life expectancy every year. Botswana, through a number of medium term policy plans, has made similar strides, although it occurred later than Uganda. These reversals are very clearly seen in the second graph.

South Africa has a lot of catching-up to do. And if that catching up is not done, South Africa’s status in the world will decline along with its competitiveness.

Graph 3: Life Expectency: South Africa vs Peers (BRICSAM excluding ASEAN countries)

In contrast, South Africa’s peer group of countries (BRICSAM: Brazil, Russia, India, China and Mexico, and the ASEAN countries) have life expectancy rates that keep increasing and, with the exception of India, relatively small HIV/AIDS per capita infection rates and/or total HIV/AIDS infections. The economic implications are well documented and do not make comfortable reading from a South African perspective. It will be where South Africa’s international competitiveness will be severely compromised. South Africa and the BRICSAM countries will all be competing for the same business.

The real question is how the Zuma administration is going to respond to this issue. The first move he made by moving Barbara Hogan out of the Health Ministry was not very comforting. Jacob Zuma’s own history does not help to raise hopes that there will be an effective policy. If, and it’s only an impression, Jacob Zuma is the type of leader who allows his Ministers to get on with policy implementation, then we must hope that Aaron Motsoaledi turns out to be an extraordinary Health Minister. He has a mistake, and a huge historical deficit, to rectify with effective policy and implementation.

¹All graphs and data provided by Gapminder World and their data providers. Gapminder provides a way to see time-series data in a completely new way.

Unite for Hunger and Hope

Unfortunately, as seen from this part of the world, this specific cause has an American slant. The reality is that the very worst conditions exist right here in Africa. And a lot of the problems the direct result of megalomaniacs like ‘Bob’ Mugabe. Zimbabwe, once the breadbasket of Southern Africa is dying. And its people are dying with it.

We as South Africans (with our own problems with hunger) have to take a lot of blame for the situation in Zimbabwe. Our former president, Thabo Mbeki, seemed to help drag the negotiations for power-sharing. The vast majority of hunger is the result of man-made catastrophes. Whether it be wars or overspending by western consumers, the result is the same. People don’t have the means provide foods for themselves and their families.

Here is one mainstream newspaper Taiwan News that can tell the story better than I can. I have asked if they could re-publish the article to coincide with this promotion.

So, is there hope? Not a realist question. There has to hope. There has to be a promise. This a case of solutions having to be found. And with a crisis at this level, it is a case of providing sufficient food so that people can survive. There is no time to fix the structural issues in the hope this will help the survival of these starving millions. But it also does not mean that we can afford to not work at the structural issues. They need to go hand in hand.

Five million (the estimated number of Zimbabweans requiring daily food aid, almost half the population) rolls off the tongue very easily. It sound a lot and it is a lot. But it is nothing but a big number that masks the reality of the suffering. It is easy to disassociate from big numbers. So look around you and find a loved one, and then imagine that they are one of those five million, with a shortened life expectancy and potential ongoing health problems for most of their lives, survivors of families that have already lost members, usually children, people who are always at risk of contracting any one of a number of diseases because their bodies are weak and their environment is not fit for human habitation.

Now wipe the tear from your eyes … and do … something.